Anyone who wants to take a touring vehicle across the ocean - whether a campervan, panel van, alcove or expedition vehicle - is faced with the fundamental question: container vs RORO for motorhomes? Both methods have clear strengths, but also limitations. In this guide, we compare safety, handling, dimensions/limitations, procedures in the harbour, documents, transit times and cost factors. There's also a concrete checklist, a pros/cons table and an FAQ with schema markup for maximum findability.
Summary: RORO (roll-on/roll-off) is often the first choice for larger, mobile motorhomes with roof extensions or superstructures. Containers score highly for compact vans and maximum load compartmentalisation - provided the door opening and interior dimensions are suitable. Your individual vehicle profile is what counts when making the final decision.
The decision between container vs RORO for motorhomes depends primarily on four parameters:
Principle: The vehicle is driven directly on board via a ramp, positioned on the vehicle deck according to the stowage plan and secured by the crew in accordance with the Cargo Securing Manual (CSM). This reduces crane handling and speeds up the harbour process.
Read more: What do I need to bear in mind for a RoRo shipment?
Principle: The vehicle is driven into a closed steel container or brought in using ramps/equipment and lashed down inside. The door opening and interior height are particularly important.
Typical reference value: Inside width approx. 2.35 m, height approx. 2.70 m, door opening approx. 2.34 m wide and approx. 2.58 m high. Please always check the actual specification.
| Criterion | RORO | Container (40'HC) |
|---|---|---|
| Suitability according to size | Very good for high/wide vehicles | Good for compact vans; critical for height/width |
| Handling/handling | Travels on board yourself | Insertion via ramps; lashing work necessary |
| Protection/separation | Secure deck environment | Maximum physical closure |
| Documentation | Standardised processes | Packing report/lashing plan useful |
| Flexibility | Frequent departures | Depending on container/packing operation |
| Special features | Tank ≤ 25 %, empty interior | Note door opening & interior height |
If you tick ≥ 3× "Yes" in a column, the procedure is usually set.
| Question | RORO | Container |
|---|---|---|
| Height > 2.65 m or roof superstructures? | ✅ | |
| Do you want maximum compartmentalisation? | ✅ | |
| Door opening 40'HC realistic? | ✅ | |
| Vehicle very wide/overbuilt? | ✅ | |
| Packstation readily available? | ✅ | |
| Want a fast harbour process? | ✅ |
Disclaimer: All information in this article has been carefully researched but is subject to change at any time. ODS Orient accepts no liability for the topicality, accuracy and completeness of the information provided.
Why shipping India needs planning security India is one of the most dynamic maritime trade markets in Asia, with ports such as JNPA/JNPT, Mundra, Chennai/Ennore, Kolkata/Haldia and Cochin. At the same time, clear import and reporting obligations apply: Imports are made electronically via ICEGATE or CBIC. Those who submit their shipment data correctly and completely reduce downtimes and additional costs - and ensure smooth processing. Main routes & [...]
Why every gram of CO₂ now counts The shipping industry is under pressure to measurably reduce its CO₂ emissions. Globally, the IMO relies on two levers: EEXI as a technical efficiency index for existing ships and CII as an annual operational rating. At the same time, the EU is tightening the fuel pathway with FuelEU Maritime and EU-ETS. For exporters, this means that routes, offers and documents must be emission-capable [...]
